Skip to content
← Back to work

Medical evidence abstraction and safety evaluation

Literature, guidance and case-style material converted into structured evidence, references and safety boundaries.

≈3.6Kevidence units2×medical review0PHI
MERIDIAN / WORKSPACE
Medical evidence abstraction and safety evaluation · workbench concept
Meridian workspace example

Task understanding before scale

A medical-knowledge evaluation used de-identified case-style material, clinical guidelines and published literature to test whether the model could separate findings, population scope, evidence strength and safety boundaries. Medically qualified contributors abstracted evidence and reviewed guideline consistency; high-risk answers received two independent medical reviews with source version, confidence and escalation rationale retained. No real patient information is shown and the work does not provide diagnosis.

01

Population, intervention, outcome and evidence grade structured

02

Dual medical review for high-risk conclusions

03

Provenance, confidence, safety boundary and escalation retained

02 / PROCUREMENT REVIEW STRUCTURE

One structure aligns the questions asked by model, data, procurement and security teams.

01 / Capability gap

Literature, guidance and case-style material converted into structured evidence, references and safety boundaries.

02 / Evaluation object

De-identified case-style material, guideline sections and peer-reviewed literature

03 / Task design

PICO abstraction, guideline consistency, safety evaluation and dual medical review

04 / Operating scale

Representative batch of approximately 3,600 evidence units with zero PHI exposure

05 / QA protocol

Medical qualification × evidence provenance × safety escalation; Provenance, confidence, safety boundary and escalation retained

06 / Evidence package

Population, intervention, outcome and evidence grade structured; Dual medical review for high-risk conclusions; All high-risk outputs entered dual review with fully traceable sources and escalation paths

07 / Disclosure

Client identity, original material and selected volumes are removed or banded. This brief explains delivery method and does not guarantee future results.

NEXT STEP

Review samples. Then define the task.

Carry this direction into your enquiry to confirm delivery, verification and sample scope.

Request samplesInspect deliverables

Build data around your next capability goal

Start with a task goal and a sample. Define the materials, specialists, verification methods and delivery scope together.