Skip to content
Axis Edge

Longer horizons. Changing evidence. More demanding work. Axis Edge studies the gaps existing data leaves behind, maintains technical dialogue with leading model teams, and develops original task environments, references and verification methods.

Explore the Lifelong research sample

Research before release

Public evaluations, technical exchanges and project feedback shape the research question. Domain experts and engineers determine whether it can become useful data.

Frontier evaluation & technical dialogue

Study failure patterns, task environments and evaluation methods with technical contributors from leading model teams. Identify capabilities that existing data does not capture.

Original tasks & reference construction

Design materials, roles and information boundaries around a capability gap. Experts produce references; engineers turn acceptance requirements into executable checks.

Trials, review & versioned iteration

Check solvability, evidence and score discrimination. Record failure analysis and revisions before expanding the scope.

Lifelong EP001

A continuous 90-day context for information updates, role boundaries and historical evidence.

90days of continuity
1,593event records
279attachments
363evaluation probes

EP001 · Fictionalized M&A research scenario · Counts from company research material.

Axis Edge Lifelong EP001 research workspace with a 90-day timeline, probes and evidence inspector
Research workbench concept based on the supplied EP001 material

A traceable task world

13 participants, four group chats and four direct-message groups form an evolving project context. Eight task types and 363 probes include answer and evidence fields, with numeric tolerances or semantic criteria set per question.

Evaluate information boundaries

The question cutoff limits available history; role visibility limits accessible material. Version updates require the model to revise earlier beliefs. References must identify the basis, change and supporting evidence.

Axis Edge Evidence inspectorSimplified interaction
Evidence evolutionTwo version snapshots

Example source: management_statement_v2.csv

Source version v2Access scopeCitable evidence

What could this role know at this time?

Change the cutoff and role. The accessible evidence changes before the answer is checked.

Two versions and two roles illustrate the boundary logic. This is not a replay of the full EP001 dataset.

Evidence available

Target A · FY2024 revenue

19,991.34CNY 10,000

Unaudited management statements. Updated from the earlier estimate of 20,654.64.

Revision: −663.30 CNY 10,000

Example values come from the supplied EP001 interface. This simplified interaction is not connected to the original data package.
A2A-001 · Research sample

Make collaboration between agents inspectable.

One agent’s correct answer does not guarantee that a team completes the work. We organize delegation, information boundaries, evidence handoffs and recovery into inspectable collaboration traces.

3agent roles3demo scenarios4research dimensions

Scope of the sample on this page

Axis Edge A2A research studio interface concept
A2A Research Studio · Interface concept
Axis EdgeCollaboration trace studio
Browser research prototype
PPlannerCurrent step
RResearcherCollaborating role
VReviewerCollaborating role

Task trace

1 / 4
PlannerResearcherReviewer

Handoff acceptance

A2A-001

The reviewer requires evidence package v2. Change the received version and check whether the handoff meets the task contract.

Task context
ctx-demo-001
Artifact
evidence_pack.json
Expected version
v2
Awaiting check

Task contracts

Retain goals, roles, input constraints and completion conditions so another agent can take over the delegated work.

Handoff evidence

Preserve sources, versions, task identifiers and artifacts to examine reliability across repeated handoffs.

Recovery behavior

Introduce timeouts, repeated responses, missing inputs and version conflicts; inspect clarification, retry and stopping behavior.

End-to-end acceptance

Check local artifact quality, collaboration and the final goal separately. A successful call alone does not establish task success.

From a collaboration to a research package.

Scenario specifications, agent capability descriptions, interaction traces, artifact references, fault conditions and acceptance rules form the sample package. The public demo focuses on version handoff; further tasks can be scoped around target capabilities.

Protocol reference: official A2A documentation

Public research we follow

We study task design and verification in public research, then turn observed capability gaps into original research material.

LongMemEval-V2Long-term memory & environment experience

Study how dynamic state, workflow knowledge and environment-specific assumptions survive long histories.

Terminal-Bench ScienceScientific research workflows

Study environments, execution artifacts and reproducible verification for scientific tasks.

SciCodeScientific reasoning & code

Study the translation of domain knowledge into code and verification through scientific constraints and numerical tests.

Turn the next capability gap into a research dataset.

Discuss research & data needsExplore our expert network