Skip to content

Deliver tasks, environments, evidence and adjudication

Complex evaluation programs should deliver more than an output table. Expert qualification, originality, references, runtime environments, trajectories, verifiers, review and version records all enter acceptance.

Validate the task and environment before scaling runs

Solvability, score discrimination, environment reproducibility and expert fit are established before run concurrency expands.

  1. 01

    Define the capability boundary

    Specify the knowledge, reasoning or execution boundary—and what a valid task must prove.

  2. 02

    Construct original work

    Expert authors and verification engineers build the task, reference, environment, rubric and validation logic.

  3. 03

    Solve & calibrate independently

    Expert solves, model pilots, environment reruns and difficulty tiers remove ambiguity, leakage and invalid work.

  4. 04

    Run controlled evaluation

    Manage task versions, trajectories, experiment logs, exceptions, rework and state evidence.

  5. 05

    Blind review & expert adjudication

    Independently review tasks, answers, traces and verifiers; resolve disagreement with source or runtime evidence.

  6. 06

    Release versions & feedback

    Deliver data, environments, verifiers and acceptance records, then carry failure patterns into the next release.

MULTI-WORKFLOW EVALUATION OPERATIONS
01

One interface

A delivery lead consolidates questions instead of exposing clients to unmanaged contributor traffic.

02

Version control

Rules, samples and feedback use explicit versions to prevent batch-to-batch drift.

03

Tiered capacity

Production, domain review and QA use distinct qualification standards.

04

Exception closure

Quality, throughput, rule and system issues follow defined escalation and rework paths.

Task difficulty determines talent and QA

L1

Domain authors

Finance / legal / medical / STEM specialists

Original authoring, reference answers, evidence derivation and professional boundaries

L2

Evaluation research

Graduate / ML researchers / advanced evaluators

Difficulty calibration, model pilots, trajectory review and failure attribution

L3

Verification engineering

ML / software / benchmark engineers

MLE, MLS, ProgramBench, DeepSWE, FrontierSWE and programmatic verification

01

SOP version

Rules and edge cases fixed for the active batch

02

Production record

Task, owner, timing and state retained

03

QA evidence

Sampling, issue attribution and rework traceable

04

Accepted batch

Qualified output and review delivered in the agreed structure

THE DELIVERY OBJECT

A package you can inspect.

Illustrative package · Original Chinese materials; fields scoped per project

Task files define the work. Verification files define the checks. The manifest records the batch, versions and materials.

task.jsonPROPOSED STRUCTURE
JSON / DESIGN EXAMPLE
{  "task_id": "DEMO-AGENT-001",  "instruction": "修复路由优先级,保留既有接口兼容性",  "inputs": [    "固定版本起始工程",    "行为规格"  ],  "environment": {    "type": "isolated_terminal",    "runtime": "项目确认"  },  "expected_artifact": [    "可构建源码",    "执行记录"  ]}

Build data around your next capability goal

Start with a task goal and a sample. Define the materials, specialists, verification methods and delivery scope together.