Financial reasoning with source evidence
Research, valuation, risk and compliance judgments delivered with answers, evidence, boundaries and review state.
Task understanding before scale
A financial-model team needed to test whether the model could reason across multi-year statements, credit policy, sector research and risk clauses without losing evidentiary grounding. We defined the document hierarchy, temporal scope and citation protocol before finance-qualified authors constructed research, valuation, risk and compliance tasks. Independent reviewers assessed conclusions and evidence spans without seeing the original judgment. Figures shown are from a representative sanitized batch; identities, source material and selected volumes have been removed or banded.
Multi-year, multi-source context with citation spans
Answer, evidence, counter-evidence and uncertainty delivered together
High-risk disagreement routed to finance adjudication
One structure aligns the questions asked by model, data, procurement and security teams.
Research, valuation, risk and compliance judgments delivered with answers, evidence, boundaries and review state.
Controlled packs spanning statements, credit policy, sector research and risk clauses
Finance authors, protocol QA and independent evidence review operated as separate roles
Representative batch of approximately 4,200 reasoning tasks at 48K–64K tokens each
Finance specialists × source evidence × independent review; High-risk disagreement routed to finance adjudication
Multi-year, multi-source context with citation spans; Answer, evidence, counter-evidence and uncertainty delivered together; Evidence-span acceptance above 97%; all high-risk disputes retained an auditable ruling
Client identity, original material and selected volumes are removed or banded. This brief explains delivery method and does not guarantee future results.
Review samples. Then define the task.
Carry this direction into your enquiry to confirm delivery, verification and sample scope.
Build data around your next capability goal
Start with a task goal and a sample. Define the materials, specialists, verification methods and delivery scope together.